DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20195091

Knowledge and predictors of retention of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among users in rural areas of Nadia district, West Bengal, India

Jitu Sharma, Jayita Pal

Abstract


Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is a safe, highly effective postpartum contraceptive, yet to be popularized at the community level in a diversified developing country like India where still the unmet need for spacing remains high. This study aimed to assess the knowledge regarding PPIUCD among users and the predictors of its retention.

Methods: A case-control study had been conducted using multi-stage sampling technique in Nadia district of West Bengal. Face to face interviews of the cases and the controls had been done with the help of a predesigned pretested semi-structured schedule. Data were entered in MS Excel and analysed in SPSS 20.0 version.

Results: Majority of the acceptors (55.2%) had poor knowledge regarding PPIUCD. Most of the participants (62.2%) retained their PPIUCD at least for 6 months. Acceptors who belonged to Hindu religion, higher socio-economic class (I and II), nuclear family, educated up to or above secondary level, ever counselled on PPIUCD, satisfied using that in day to day life, undergone follow-up visits and had correct knowledge regarding different aspects of PPIUCD had higher odds of retention of PPIUCD.

Conclusions: Regular awareness campaigns, counselling at household level, advocacy are the utmost needs of the hour to motivate the eligible couple for its acceptance and retention.


Keywords


India, Knowledge, Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device, Retention, Rural, West Bengal

Full Text:

PDF

References


National Rural Health Mission Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India. JSY. Available at: http://www.mohfw.nic.in/layout_09 06;.pdf. Accessed on 14th August 2019.

Celen S, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danişman N. Clinical outcomes of early post placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contracept. 2004;69:279-82.

Chethan R, Anitha GS, Savitha C. Study on postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device practices and causes for discontinuation of PPIUCD at follow up in a tertiary hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:2299-303.

Family Planning Division. Postpartum IUCD Reference Manual. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010. Available at: www.nrhmtn.gov.in/modules/PPIUCD %20Reference%20Manual.pdf. Accessed on 14th August 2019.

Katheit G, Agarwal J. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care center. Int J Repro Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):539-43.

Yadav A, Koshalya. Knowledge and attitude among antenatal mothers regarding PPIUCD at a selected hospital of Jaipur district. Int J Med Health Res. 2017;3(11):63-5.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Studies; 2017. Available at: rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf. Accessed on 14th August 2019.

Majhi AK. Importance of PPIUCD in the perspective of present Indian population scenario. Indian J Perinatol Reproductive Biol. 2012;2:5-7.

Kanhere A, Pateriya P, Jain M. Acceptability and Feasibility of Immediate postpartum IUCD insertion in a tertiary care centre in Central India. Int J Reproduct Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2015;4(1):1.

Shukla M, Qureshi S, Chandrawati. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion-a five-year experience at a tertiary care centre in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(3):432-5.

Kant S, Archana S, Singh AK, Ahamed F, Haldar P. Acceptance rate, probability of follow-up, and expulsion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device offered at two primary health centers, North India. J Family Med Primary Care. 2016;5(4):770-6.

Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, Charurat E, Lalchandani K, Semba R, et al. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):32.

Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in Observational epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 1996.

Pandey VK, Aggarwal P, Kakkar R. Modified BG Prasad’s Socio-economic Classification-2018: The need of an update in the present scenario. Indian J Comm Health. 2018;30(1):82-4.

Janwadkar A, Shekhawat GS. Acceptance, perception, experience and satisfaction of the couple with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertion. Asian Pac J Health Sci. 2016;3(4):55-64.

Valliappan A, Dorairajan G, Chinnakali P. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: Knowledge and factors affecting acceptance among pregnant/parturient women attending a large tertiary health center in Puducherry, India. Int J Adv Med Health Res. 2017;4:69-74.

Asnani M, Agarwal A, Singh R. Study of knowledge, attitude, practices regarding PPIUCD among antenatal women at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:1111-4.

Kathpalia SK, Mustafa MS. Awareness about postpartum insertion of intrauterine device among antenatal cases. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(3):221-4.

Gautam I. A study of cases of discontinuation of PPIUCD at a tertiary care centre. J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17(4):18-20.

Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(5):337-43.

Thapa K, Dhital R, Rajbhandari S, Acharya S, Mishra S, Pokhrel SM, et al. Factors affecting the behaviour outcomes on post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device uptake and continuation in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):148.